THE ESSENTIAL NEW INTERNATIONAL

THE ESSENTIAL NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER

By Manuel E. Yepe http://manuelyepe.wordpress.com/

Google translation awaiting the human one.

When prospered the idea of making a reform of the United Nations (UN) on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the international organization, in 1995 the aim pursued by most member countries was to match its structure and working mechanisms with changes occurred in the world during the half-century since its inception, and in particular, the conclusion of, resulting from the collapse of the socialist system in Europe cold War.

The international political situation seemed so favorable to move towards a globalized world through dialogue and cooperation among nations, supported by the great advances in science and technology enablers interdependence and communication between nations.

Early these aspirations were thwarted when the fact dissipation bipolar character of the world was exploited by the US to promote imposing their criteria in economic, political, military, the legal and other dimensions of international relations, all for the sake of making absolute world domination.

The nations of Europe and Japan became servile to change its minority share in the spoils alliance. This prevented the proper scenario existed for a fair reform of the UN when in the second half of the decade of the nineties began discussions around that purpose.

Initially, the expansion of the Security Council of the UN was the subject which he made more proposals, following unilateral action by the United States when, without respecting the UN Charter or the dictates of the Security Council, conducted the dismemberment complicity in Yugoslavia in several European countries and a few years later, he waged against Iraq.

United States initiated thereafter, the practice of masking their actions under the UN flag to give a veneer of legitimacy to operations force that only served to their particular purposes and promoting the establishment of new rules and principles in international relations .

It was creating, growing and consolidating relations among nations and world public opinion, an image of omnipresence and omnipotence of the United States.

The operations for the preservation of democracy, for peacekeeping and humanitarian problems to solve cases were some of the excuses peaked by the only superpower to its interventions in various countries. After Yugoslavia and Iraq, Somalia came in 1992 and Haiti in 1994. Behind those actions in which it is involved the UN, was the US decision to consolidate global undisputed hegemony.

As the new century, the United States maintained an economic boom lived for nearly eight years, the European Union (EU) expressed low growth rates, Japan was involved in serious economic difficulties of organic nature and Southeast Asian countries just beginning recover from the devastating monetary-financial crisis of 1997. Russia was just beginning to rise from the devastating impact of his passing caboose superpower of world capitalism. Only socialist China showed high rates of development and maintained.

Although the terrorist attacks of 2001 in the United States, 2004 Madrid and 2005 in London contributed to legitimizing the political-military concepts previously developed by the US on the war against terrorism, preventive wars, humanitarian intervention and other tactics, Washington was assigned new tasks to incorporate the struggle against tyranny with its strategy for world hegemony.

US uses the UN as an interventionist agency to legitimize its wars, set standards that the world must abide by and implement its global dictatorship. The used as a military instrument of his new world order, as have the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization on the economic front.

The urgency of reforming the Security Council derives from that, however pressing for other changes to be included in the essential purpose of updating the organization is through this high authority that the US has always tried to dominate, reducing its Secretariat simple administrative tool and ignore the role of the General Assembly of the UN as the only genuine representative of the world community of nations.

The reform of the Security Council and its conversion into a truly democratic, representative and transparent body would be a great gift to mankind could make the United Nations at its 65th birthday in 2015.

November 29, 2014.

		THE ESSENTIAL NEW INTERNATIONAL ORDER By Manuel E. Yepe http://manuelyepe.wordpress.com/ Google translation awaiting the human one. When prospered the idea of making a reform of the United Nations (UN) on the occasion of the fiftieth anniversary of the international organization, in 1995 the aim pursued by most member countries was to match its structure and working mechanisms with changes occurred in the world during the half-century since its inception, and in particular, the conclusion of, resulting from the collapse of the socialist system in Europe cold War. The international political situation seemed so favorable to move towards a globalized world through dialogue and cooperation among nations, supported by the great advances in science and technology enablers interdependence and communication between nations. Early these aspirations were thwarted when the fact dissipation bipolar character of the world was exploited by the US to promote imposing their criteria in economic, political, military, the legal and other dimensions of international relations, all for the sake of making absolute world domination. The nations of Europe and Japan became servile to change its minority share in the spoils alliance. This prevented the proper scenario existed for a fair reform of the UN when in the second half of the decade of the nineties began discussions around that purpose. Initially, the expansion of the Security Council of the UN was the subject which he made more proposals, following unilateral action by the United States when, without respecting the UN Charter or the dictates of the Security Council, conducted the dismemberment complicity in Yugoslavia in several European countries and a few years later, he waged against Iraq. United States initiated thereafter, the practice of masking their actions under the UN flag to give a veneer of legitimacy to operations force that only served to their particular purposes and promoting the establishment of new rules and principles in international relations . It was creating, growing and consolidating relations among nations and world public opinion, an image of omnipresence and omnipotence of the United States. The operations for the preservation of democracy, for peacekeeping and humanitarian problems to solve cases were some of the excuses peaked by the only superpower to its interventions in various countries. After Yugoslavia and Iraq, Somalia came in 1992 and Haiti in 1994. Behind those actions in which it is involved the UN, was the US decision to consolidate global undisputed hegemony. As the new century, the United States maintained an economic boom lived for nearly eight years, the European Union (EU) expressed low growth rates, Japan was involved in serious economic difficulties of organic nature and Southeast Asian countries just beginning recover from the devastating monetary-financial crisis of 1997. Russia was just beginning to rise from the devastating impact of his passing caboose superpower of world capitalism. Only socialist China showed high rates of development and maintained. Although the terrorist attacks of 2001 in the United States, 2004 Madrid and 2005 in London contributed to legitimizing the political-military concepts previously developed by the US on the war against terrorism, preventive wars, humanitarian intervention and other tactics, Washington was assigned new tasks to incorporate the struggle against tyranny with its strategy for world hegemony. US uses the UN as an interventionist agency to legitimize its wars, set standards that the world must abide by and implement its global dictatorship. The used as a military instrument of his new world order, as have the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization on the economic front. The urgency of reforming the Security Council derives from that, however pressing for other changes to be included in the essential purpose of updating the organization is through this high authority that the US has always tried to dominate, reducing its Secretariat simple administrative tool and ignore the role of the General Assembly of the UN as the only genuine representative of the world community of nations. The reform of the Security Council and its conversion into a truly democratic, representative and transparent body would be a great gift to mankind could make the United Nations at its 65th birthday in 2015. November 29, 2014.
		EL IMPRESCINDIBLE NUEVO ORDEN INTERNACIONAL Por Manuel E. Yepe http://manuelyepe.wordpress.com/ Cuando en 1995 prosperó la idea de efectuar una reforma de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) en ocasión del cincuentenario del organismo internacional, el propósito perseguido por la mayoría de los países miembros era hacer corresponder su estructura y mecanismos de trabajo con los cambios ocurridos en el mundo durante el medio siglo transcurrido desde su creación y, en particular, la conclusión de la guerra fría, resultante del derrumbe del sistema socialista en Europa. El momento político internacional parecía entonces favorable para avanzar hacia un mundo globalizado mediante el diálogo y la colaboración entre las naciones, apoyado por los grandes adelantos de la ciencia y la tecnología propiciadores de la interdependencia y la comunicación entre las naciones. Tempranamente se frustraron esas aspiraciones cuando la circunstancia de la disipación del carácter bipolar del mundo fue aprovechada por Estados Unidos para promover la imposición de sus criterios en lo económico, lo político, lo militar, lo jurídico y en las demás dimensiones de las relaciones internacionales, todo en aras de hacer absoluto su dominio mundial. Las naciones de Europa y Japón optaron por la alianza servil a cambio de su participación minoritaria en el botín. Ello impidió que existiera el escenario adecuado para realizar una justa reforma de la ONU cuando en el segundo lustro del decenio de los noventa se iniciaron los debates en torno a ese propósito. Inicialmente, la ampliación del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU fue el tema que concertó más propuestas, a raíz de acciones unilaterales emprendidas por Estados Unidos cuando, sin respetar la Carta de la ONU ni los dictados del Consejo de Seguridad, llevó a cabo el desmembramiento de Yugoslavia en complicidad de varios países europeos y, pocos años más tarde, la emprendió contra Irak. Estados Unidos inició, a partir de entonces, la práctica de enmascarar sus acciones bajo la bandera de la ONU para dar visos de legitimidad a operaciones de fuerza que solo servían para sus fines particulares e impulsar el establecimiento de nuevas normas y principios en las relaciones internacionales. Se fue creando, creciendo y consolidando en las relaciones entre las naciones, así como en la opinión pública mundial, una imagen de omnipresencia y omnipotencia de Estados Unidos. Las operaciones para la preservación de la democracia, para el mantenimiento de la paz y para solucionar supuestos problemas humanitarios fueron algunos de los pretextos enarbolados por la superpotencia única para sus intervenciones en diversos países. Luego de Yugoslavia e Irak, vino Somalia en 1992 y Haití en 1994. Detrás de aquellas acciones en las que se involucraba a la ONU, estaba la decisión estadounidense de consolidar a nivel mundial una hegemonía indiscutida. Al comenzar el nuevo siglo, Estados Unidos vivía un auge económico mantenido durante casi ocho años, la Unión Europea (UE) manifestaba bajos ritmos de crecimiento, Japón se hallaba envuelto en serias dificultades económicas de carácter orgánico y los países del sudeste de Asia apenas empezaban a recuperarse de la demoledora crisis monetario-financiera de 1997. Rusia recién comenzaba a levantarse del demoledor impacto de su paso de superpotencia a furgón de cola del capitalismo mundial. Sólo China socialista mostraba elevados y mantenidos ritmos de desarrollo. Aunque los atentados terroristas del 2001 en Estados Unidos, 2004 en Madrid y 2005 en Londres contribuyeron a legitimar las concepciones político-militares previamente elaboradas por EEUU sobre la guerra contra el terrorismo, las guerras preventivas, las intervenciones humanitarias y otras tácticas, Washington se asignó nuevas tareas al incorporar las luchas contra las tiranías a su estrategia para alcanzar la hegemonía mundial. EEUU se sirve de la ONU como agencia intervencionista para legitimar sus guerras, fijar las normas que el mundo debe acatar e instrumentar su dictadura global. La utiliza como instrumento militar de su nuevo orden mundial, como lo han sido el Fondo Monetario Internacional, el Banco Mundial y la Organización del Comercio Mundial en el frente económico. La urgencia de reformar el Consejo de Seguridad deriva de que, por muy urgentes que sean las demás transformaciones que deban incluirse en el imprescindible propósito de actualizar la organización, es a través de este alto órgano que Estados Unidos ha pretendido siempre dominarla, reducir a su Secretaría a simple herramienta administrativa y desconocer la función de la Asamblea General de la ONU como el único representante genuino de la comunidad mundial de naciones. La reforma de su Consejo de Seguridad y su conversión en un órgano verdaderamente democrático, representativo y transparente sería un magnífico regalo que podría hacer a la Humanidad la Organización de Naciones Unidas en su 65º cumpleaños en 2015. Noviembre 29 de 2014.